Archive for November, 2009

The One-Year Test

Tuesday, November 24th, 2009

In continuing our series about how to stay sane during the onslaught of marketing over the course of the holiday season, here is our second tip:

Before you buy something, do the one-year test. This one is pretty self-explanatory. It means that, any time you’re about to make a purchase, think about where that item will be one year from now. Maybe your child absolutely has to have the pricey toy today, but one year from now, it is likely that he or she will have moved on to something else. Or that sweater you’re coveting–will it still be in style in November 2010, or will you consider it dated and stuff it in the deep recesses of your closet?

Of course, especially when shopping for the under-18 crowd, the rules change a little. It’s part of figuring our your own personal identity to go through phases, and denying your teen the ability to experiment can be harsh. And for younger kids, it’s a fact that they will have outgrown those clothes by next year, but they still need clothes. Toys are designed to stimulate different age groups, so it’s unrealistic to expect that a puzzle which fascinated your two-year-old will still hold his or her attention at age five.  In cases like these, it can be helpful to consider two things: durability and excess.

For example, those clothes–are they made well enough that they might be suitable to hand down, or give to a Goodwill or the Salvation Army? At the very least, look for things that may have more than one life in them. And for the teen, it’s okay to indulge their punk rock phase, but to a point. They don’t need every album or every t-shirt, and it’s ok to ask them to prioritize. Perhaps this is lofty, but giving kids the “perfect Christmas” with their entire, completed wish list under the tree, might not be the healthiest thing in the long run. It’s good to learn that you can’t always have everything.

So when you’re waiting in a checkout line, resist the urge to buy all the little things they try to get you to buy on your way out, like purse-sized perfume spray or a Lego accessory. Those impulse buys add up, and when you find them stuffed under the bed or in your junk drawer a year from now, you’ll wonder why you ever bought them in the first place.

–Emily Long

What does your holiday shopping really cost?

Wednesday, November 18th, 2009

Rise and shine, shoppers!

Rise and shine, shoppers!

I personally have a deep love of the holiday season, but I know many people who do not. Reasons include sentiments such as “Peace on Earth” which are forgotten after January 1, obligatory family time and holiday parties, but the one constant I almost always hear is stress. And that stress is usually related to money.

Shopping can indeed be a high-stress venture over the holidays, given the crowds, the sales, the picking-the-perfect-gift challenge and a host of other elements like the tempting food court in the mall. But, it doesn’t have to be that way, so throughout the holiday season, we at The LAMP are offering some simple ways to keep your spending (and sanity) in check during one of the most difficult times for consumers. The first one is:

The real cost is not on the price tag. On Black Friday, thousands of people head to stores right after that last bite of pumpkin pie, prepared to wait for hours in their cars or on sidewalks for “doorbuster deals.” People get injured, angry and broke over a zeal to complete all of their holiday shopping in one day, or to save money on a new flatscreen.

Before you join the fray, ask yourself if this is worth it. Is buying the hot holiday toy for your kid really worth coming home in a foul mood, exhausted, resentful of what you just had to go through for it? Remember that you teach your children what the holidays are about. If you act as though shopping is at the heart of all December activity, odds are that your children grow up and continue the vicious cycle. They recall not that holidays are about building relationships with your friends and family, but that they are for competitive shopping excursions. If you are someone who finds yourself exceedingly stressed this time of year, take a second and think–how did your parents act during the holiday season?

In the end, you may finally be getting the TV you’ve always wanted, or you may be getting your children the toys at the top of their lists. But, you’ve lost the ability to sleep in the day after a large meal, a bit of your sanity has been sacrificed, and you’re buying into what retailers mean when they say dreams come true at the holidays. The $200 you saved to buy something you probably don’t really need, the lesson taught to your child when he receives every gift on his wishlist–how much does that cost?

–Emily Long

Regret, Resignation and News Literacy

Thursday, November 12th, 2009

Sean Hannity

Sean Hannity

I’m guessing most of you heard on the news this morning that CNN anchor Lou Dobbs resigned as of last night, after much controversy over his remarks about the validity of President Obama’s birth certificate.  Also last night, Sean Hannity apologized to viewers for splicing footage from two different political rallies to make one appear larger, and acknowledged that Jon Stewart was right.  What is going on?

These incidents strike me as a possible indication that we are becoming more news literate. I do believe that as far as television news is concerned, the line between journalism and editorializing seems to have blurred. I’m happy that people are asking questions, and they are asking them loudly enough that networks have no choice but to respond. I applaud CNN for its choice to remove a pundit masquerading as a reporter, and though Sean Hannity may continue to carry that mantle, I applaud him for apologizing. I have no more or less respect for his work, but it takes a lot for people to admit they were wrong, and perhaps even more so when such an admission takes place in front of audience of millions. The news frequently gets things wrong, and it frequently oversteps the boundaries of strict journalism, but it is not often that the people involved make such public apologies. (Even retractions are typically found only in fine print.) It makes me proud that the notion of news reporting as fallible is catching on.

Meanwhile, we have not heard the last from either Lou Dobbs or Sean Hannity, and we will certainly continue to hear irresponsible reporting and poorly-argued editorials. News literacy continues to be of key importance in a media-saturated environment; simply removing someone doesn’t make us more literate. But it does provide a strong example to back up what we at The LAMP say often: When we demand smarter media, the media producers will respond. After all, the best argument for removing Lou Dobbs, at least from a CNN perspective, is the ratings drop.

–Emily Long

RIP Gossip Girl

Tuesday, November 10th, 2009

I wrote about my love of the CW teen drama Gossip Girl before, but times have changed, and my once-beloved television show has since fallen from grace. Gossip Girl’s ratings were always low considering the appeal and media attention the show received, but this was more a reflection of the fact that young people watched the show online, viewership that our antiquated ratings system still does not adequately account for. But now, the show’s ratings have sunk even lower, and the dip can no longer be attributed to our changing habits of media consumption. There’s no excuse — just the cold hard truth that Gossip Girl has fallen victim to the same flaws that undo many great television teen dramas. Although the writing still retains some of the sharp wit and clever innuendo that attracted me to the show in the first place, the characters have became caricatures of whatever stereotypical teenage archetype they were supposed to represent, their relationships are incredibly twisted and convoluted, and even considering the suspension of disbelief with which I approach the show, the story arcs are just too preposterous to handle (and this is coming from someone who owns every season of Saved by the Bell on DVD).

But Gossip Girl was such a pleasure for me, for so many different reasons, that I would be remiss if I neglected to bid it a proper farewell. As I mentioned, the writing on the show is smart, witty, quick, snarky – basically everything good TV writing should be. And, like Sex and the City and 30 Rock, unlike Friends and How I Met Your Mother, Gossip Girl revels in the fact that it takes place in New York City.

But, perhaps more importantly, Gossip Girl also offered some interesting – albeit melodramatic – commentary and analysis of media, particularly in regards to youth. To start with, the show’s sharp-tongued titular character is a blogger who runs a gossip site documenting the exploits of our favorite “Upper East Siders.” The gang and their peers keep up with Gossip Girl’s latest news via cell phone browsers and text message blasts. Several episodes have focused on the reaction of school administrators to the new breed of disciplinary issues that crop up as a result of computer and cell phone technologies – begging the questions, what is a school’s responsibility, and what is their right when disciplining students for digital misdeeds? And then there was the whole “truth-in-advertising” campaign (here and here), in which advertisers reappropriated some choice criticisms of the show, brilliant, disgusting, and subversive all at once.

My interest in the show has been waning since the middle of the second season earlier this year, but I tuned in yesterday to see the newest episode – the one that had the Parents Television Council in a tizzy because it presented “impressionable teenagers” with “behaviors heretofore associated primarily with adult films” (or, in other words, there was a threesome). I would be inclined to agree with PTC, but I can see the threesome for what it is. The episode – which I saw and felt was actually fairly tame considering the fact that it was a threesome – was little more than a distasteful and only marginally successful ratings ploy.

So PTC, you would have a valid reason for concern – if anyone were actually watching Gossip Girl. But they aren’t. As this article put it: “Despite its uncanny ability to attract attention, Gossip Girl doesn’t attract TV viewers.” PTC, you’re just adding fuel to the fire. The threesome was nothing but the last dying gasp of what was once considered The Greatest Teen Dream of All Time. Let it go in peace.

– Megha Kohli, intern

News from The LAMP! Our November Illuminations Newsletter

Monday, November 9th, 2009


The LAMP Illuminations
November 2009
In This Issue
Spotlight: Lorenzo Tijerina
Highlight: Katherine Fry Speaks!
Gaslight: November in Media History

Happening now at The LAMP…

Mt Hope

This month, The LAMP continues its workshops with Mount Hope in The Bronx and Brooklyn Prospect Charter School in Brooklyn, and will also be conducting a professional development workshop with teachers at MOUSE. This follows presentations by Executive Director D.C. Vito and Communications Director Emily Long on social media for the Business Development Institute, and Education Director Katherine Fry’s participation on a news literacy panel with the New York State Communications Association! If you’re interested in hosting a workshop for teachers or in having a LAMP representative speak at your event, email us at info@thelampnyc.org.

Spotlight: Lorenzo Tijerina
LorenzoLorenzo Tijerina is a father, former television news editor, independent videographer and photographer…and LAMP facilitator! Check out our Spotlight interview to read about his experience working in TV news, his path to media literacy and the media he creates with his young son.

Highlight: Katherine Fry Speaks!

Katherine FryThe LAMP’s Education Director, Katherine Fry, Ph.D., is also a prominent media scholar. On November 10th at 11am, Dr. Fry will offer a lecture presentation called “Mother Choices: Evaluating Moms Evaluating News.” The lecture, which will take place in the Woody Tanger auditorium of the Brooklyn College library, describes her current research: an exploration of changes in news and the identity of mothers. This talk is part of the Wolfe Institute in the Humanities lecture series at Brooklyn College, where Dr. Fry is an associate professor in the Dept. of Television and Radio. And, if you have plans to be in Chicago on November 14, don’t miss Dr. Fry’s presentation on News Literacy at the National Communication Association!

To help us continue our services as New York City’s only nonprofit organization giving free media literacy workshops to parents, youth and educators, please consider a small tax-deductible donation. Your donation goes to work immediately supporting workshop equipment, supplies, and administrative and facilitator fees.

Join Our Mailing List

The LAMP will not share or sell your email address.  Period.

The LAMP recommends: Feed by M.T. Anderson

Feed cover

Feed by M.T. Anderson is the story of what happens if media technologies continue to develop and if we continue to fail at preparing our youth to deal with the resulting barrage of media messages. In this ironic satirical YA novel, Anderson presents a world where a computer “feed” is connected directly to the human brain, leading to a glut of consumption and information overload. Complete with brilliantly updated versions of teenage slang, Feed tells the story of a boy named Titus, who fails to question the world he lives in, until he meets Violet, a girl with a mind of her own–even if it’s still connected to the feed.–Megha Kohli

Gaslight: November
in Media History

November was a tumultuous month for the makers of media. Why? Check out this month’s Gaslight entry!

Hollywood Ten

Connect with The LAMP on:

LAMP delicious
LAMP SU
LAMP YouTube
LAMP Twitter
LAMP facebook
LAMP flickr
change logo

Explore our website!

Spotlight: Lorenzo Tijerina: LAMP teacher, father, former TV news editor

Friday, November 6th, 2009

Lorenzo Tijerina

Lorenzo Tijerina

Occupation: Currently, I am doing freelance videography and editing, working on everything from music videos to weddings to profile pieces. I’m also involved in some very rewarding work with The LAMP, teaching kids how to be more proactive when it comes to their media consumption.

Favorite blogs & websites: I use blogs to stay in the loop about what’s going on in Brooklyn and the rest of the city: Kinetic Carnival, McBrooklyn, Only the Blog Knows Brooklyn, Brooklyn Vegan. TheSkint is a great place to find great deals around the city. I have an electronic subscription to The New Yorker and I’ll also turn to the New York Times Online and the Guardian for news. The Onion has a great website and I enjoy checking out their A/V Club. Sites like Gawker, Geekologie, and Videogum keep me hip. My son and I spend a lot of time together on YouTube not only posting our own content, but watching old music videos. Another favorite site of his is Sploder, where we can make our own video games. And with Netflix and Hulu it seems there are less and less reasons to turn on the television these days.

What got you interested in media literacy? I would have to say my interest in media literacy began with watching television as a child and recognizing patterns in the shows and commercials. I began asking myself why these patterns existed. Why, for example, did cartoons like He-Man always go to a commercial about eight minutes into the show and how did that effect the structure of the show?

In school I gravitated toward whatever audio/visual options were available, even if it was just operating the projector on movie day. By the time I was in high school I was very aware television was always trying to sell something and viewed even my favorite shows with skepticism.

In college I studied radio, television and film and that took my media literacy to a whole new level. We studied mass communications and learned the techniques used by broadcasters to manipulate their audience. When you think of what the average young person is up against when they turn on a television or, now, their computer, the need for media literacy is more important than ever.

You used to be an editor at Fox News. How does that experience change the way you look at media? I worked at several news stations. It was a great experience and I would be less than honest if I didn’t admit that I absolutely loved it. The pace and the excitement of live television is undeniable. Working in television you see that there is no grand conspiracy. The higher ups are driven by ratings and everybody else is just trying to do the best job they can. It’s very competitive. A great deal of what you see on television is motivated by stations just trying to keep up with one another. A lot of the theory I learned in school went out the window and it all became a matter of trying to outdo what the other guy’s where putting up. I did, however, see the answer to my He-Man question first hand. News has a very strict format dictated by commercials, i.e. all the real news is in the first block while the last block is reserved for the kicker (a fluffy story about water skiing squirrels or whatever).

You’re also teaching one of The LAMP’s workshops at Brooklyn Prospect Charter School. What has surprised you the most so far in working with the students? Working with the kids at Brooklyn Prospect, the biggest surprise was how aware so many of them are about things like target audience and viewer tracking. These kids are very cognizant of their value as consumers and as the children of consumers. It was just below the surface, but once we started asking them questions their response was immediate. You could literally see the realization on their faces when they were asked to think about why their favorite websites are set up the way they are. (Click here to see pictures from this workshop and others!)

We know you do a lot of video projects with your young son. Tell us more about that–why do you think that’s important, and what do you hope to impart? For us it’s mostly about having a good time, exploring ideas creatively. I want my son to be able to express himself any way he sees fit, so that’s part of it, too. I also try to pass on whatever knowledge I have about technique and get him to think about the ways stories are told, but mostly it’s just a way for us to spend time together.

The LAMP is featured on TheReali!

Tuesday, November 3rd, 2009

Gaslight: November in Media History

Monday, November 2nd, 2009

Tina Fey and Seth Myers picket at Rockefeller Center.

Tina Fey and Seth Myers picket at Rockefeller Center.

November 5, 2007 marked the first day of a strike by the Writers Guild of America-West and WGA-East which lasted one hundred days. The main issue was the compensation received by writers, which was meager when compared with large studio profits, and also how writers were to be compensated for reality and online content. The WGA strike is significant for many reasons: It was a clear turning point in the business of digital media, cost Hollywood billions of dollars, and drew attention to the plight of thousands of people working behind the scenes of media which most of us take for granted as being free (not to mention illegally downloadable). On February 26, 2008, a new contract was ratified by the union, and writers went back to work with new rights and protections. However, that contract is up in 2011, and a lot can happen between now and then in the world of media and entertainment. The issue will linger as long as we have an Internet, but the WGA strike  represented the arguably first big shot across the bow of the online media business.

On November 13, 1969, United States Vice President Spiro Agnew gave a speech in Des Moines, Iowa, accusing the nation’s television networks of using bias and distortion in their reporting. He further urged viewers to “register their complaints on bias through mail to the networks and phone calls to local stations.” Agnew lamented that the media was dictated by a small group of men, informing the opinions of an estimated 40 millions Americans who watched the nightly news, and who had recently seen several newsmen harshly critique President Nixon’s November 3 speech on Vietnam minutes after it was delivered. Forty years later, this event is especially significant amid the conflict between Barack Obama’s White House and Roger Ailes’ Fox News, with White House Communications Director Anita Dunn saying that the Administration is “not going to legitimize them as a news organization.” Then, as now, the White House was trying to define the meaning and purpose of news, and possibly reign in an independent and free press. In both cases, it seems, the Presidents might have been wishing that Americans were just a little more news literate.

The Hollywood Ten with their lawyers

The Hollywood Ten with their lawyers

November 25, 1947: A group of ten screenwriters and directors, known collectively as “The Hollywood Ten” are fired from their jobs in the first systemic Hollywood blacklist. Alvah Bessie, Herbert Biberman, Lester Cole, Edward Dmytryk, Ring Lardner, Jr., John Howard Lawson, Albert Maltz, Samuel Ornitz, Adrian Scott and Dalton Trumbo were all held in contempt of court one day prior for refusing to testify before the House of Un-American Activities (HUAC). Ultimately, 41 artists were called to testify, and over 320 people were eventually added to the blacklist that kept them from working in Hollywood. HUAC feared that these artists were  Communists, imbuing their work with propaganda designed to recruit members to the Communist Party. Those who refused to “name names” of anyone they knew who might be a Communist were added to the list, leaving many prominent voices silent, livelihoods destroyed and promising careers cut short. Those who did testify were despised by many of Hollywood’s elite, including Elia Kazan, who, when honored with the 1999 Lifetime Achievement Award from the Academy of Motion Pictures and Sciences, was met with protest; many Oscar attendees refused to stand when he took the podium to accept the award. The blacklisting of the Hollywood 10 was a pivotal moment in American cinematic history, both acknowledging and condemning the power of film.

Grassroots.org
Creative Commons License