On Wednesday, June 9, join The LAMP and Alejandra Ramos of Always Order Dessert at the Double Windsor bar in Brooklyn for a delicious dessert contest between New York City’s hottest food bloggers before a panel of celebrity judges…and you! Participants include Rachel of O Magazine, Katy at Sugarlaws, Anna at Very Small Anna, Jen from Local Appetite, author Giulia Melucci from I Loved, I Lost, I Made Spaghetti, James Briscione from Food Network’s Chopped, Rebecca from Working Class Foodies, Esther of Ambitious Delicious(ness), Divya Gugnani from Behind the Burner and Emily from (non) adventures of an amateur. Tickets are $20 online or $25 at the door, and get you a tasting plate of each dessert, one raffle ticket and exclusive drink specials. All proceeds benefit The LAMP–buy your tickets today!
Archive for May, 2010
Spotlight: Jennifer Proulx, from media production to media literacy
Friday, May 21st, 2010
This month, we interviewed Jennifer Proulx, The LAMP’s newest board member. We asked her about why she decided to move from her career in media production to media literacy, what she’ll be doing in Chicago this summer, and about her love for the Red Sox. Sort of.
How did you get into video production? I suppose you could say I fell into it. I made a few videos in high school and was intrigued by the power of moving images and sound so pursued it formally in my undergraduate studies.
What were some of the highlights of your career? I feel a bit awkward creating a highlight reel when I feel there’s so much more to come! But here goes: Traveling around the world covering a yacht race, serving a year with Americorps in a 1st grade classroom, teaching video production to community college students, watching a pro-social program on H.I.V. that I cut at a film festival at the U.N., producing, directing, and cutting a video in support of the Reproductive Health Act for the New York Civil Liberties Union, and seeing my name on television for the first time.
What was the most surprising thing you learned about the media industry? That despite the myth, some edit rooms have windows, and even views!
Why did you decide to move on from production to pursue an M.P.A. (Master’s in Public Administration)? I had a blast making television programs and working on important projects but realized I didn’t want my boss’s job and had grown as much as I wanted in my role. I am looking for the next challenge or as Billy Bragg would say, “the great leap forward.” I’ve always been drawn towards social justice issues, specifically education, so decided to go back to school to learn the nuts and bolts of how to systematically create change.
What got you interested in media literacy? I had a professor named Michelle Wolf for an undergrad course. She has worked extensively on issues of media literacy, specifically with regard to body image issues. She instilled in me, and countless others, the importance of a responsible media and as cheesy as it sounds, when I left her class I felt I had a duty to go out into the world and practice what I learned from her course.
What are your plans for the summer? This summer I landed a fellowship to work in the Chicago Public Schools. I will be working on the 21st Century Learning Project which is an initiative to bring our classrooms into the 21st century with regard to technology. There’s a really exciting opportunity to help close achievement gap through technology. I’ll be working specifically on creating benchmarks, disseminating best practices, and updating evaluation techniques.
What makes the Yankees a superior team to the Red Sox? The Yankees have the swagger and glow of a World Series winning team, which they deserve. I predict Big Papi will continue to mash, leading us into a classic Yankees/Red Sox battle to the finish in late August and September. No matter what happens in the end, the Red Sox are always the superior team in my heart.
The Nestle Surrender: Slacktivism at work
Wednesday, May 19th, 2010
Supporters of Greenpeace’s campaign against Nestlé cheered this week when the corporate food giant presented a formal plan created in collaboration with The Forest Trust to stop using palm oil from rainforest-destroying suppliers. According to Greenpeace, this is the result of their anti-Nestlé campaign, which included a satiric Kit Kat commercial that garnered over 1.5 million views, inspired a couple hundred thousand emails to the company and an assault on Nestlé’s Facebook page. Taking steps towards saving the habitat of orangutans in Indonesia is great, but that’s not the really remarkable thing. This is slacktivism moving from online to offline.
Slacktivism is a somewhat touchy subject, as it refers to when people want to do good or advocate for a cause, but basically aren’t willing to get off the couch to do it. Some people argue that this is better than nothing, others argue that it essentially is nothing. Largely as a result of new media, it is much easier now to join a campaign or cause than it used to be. Not so long ago, if I wanted to battle Nestle, I would have had to first hear about the issue, most likely through print media or word-of-mouth. Then, I would have to get up, write a letter to the company, get the company’s address, put a stamp on it, walk it to the mailbox and hope that it got to the right person. Now I can send that same letter with a mouse click, and if I’m worried that no one will read it, I can openly attack the company and publicize the cause, perhaps inspiring others to join. I don’t have to go to a rally, which may or may not be in my area, and if I want to donate money, I can do that on my phone. But is that necessarily a good thing?
In some ways, no. The hope is that when you join a cause, you do so because you are willing to invest in it, not because you read a friend’s status update and figure, why not? Really making a change requires more than sending an email; in the case of Nestlé, it would also mean a personal boycott of their products, which would require at least a little research into their other products, and it may mean you can’t eat things you really enjoy, like Kit Kats. Here, you’re involved, you’re invested and you’re essentially using your shopping habits to vote against the company in a way that impacts their bottom line.
However, this does take a little more effort, and your personal ban on Kit Kats might not garner much media attention. A mass of people essentially posting open letters slamming a company and clearly incurring its wrath does make the news, and can quickly grow impossible to ignore. At the same time, maybe this makes it too easy to join a cause. You spread yourself thin when you’re signed up for dozens of mailing lists and newsletters soliciting you for money, constantly donating your online status or profile picture, voting for what charity should receive funding, signing digital petitions, forwarding action emails and emailing politicians–especially if you’re doing this for a number of causes which caught your eye. Eventually, you probably drop off a few of those mailing lists. You’ve made your voice heard, an action which has value in itself, but outside of that, what have you done? Slacktivism can create the illusion that you’re doing good, when really, you’re not doing much at all.
We all have to pick and choose, and while there an infinite number of charities and organizations and campaigns which are worthwhile, most of us don’t have the time to really participate in more than a couple at a time. The success of Greenpeace’s campaign against Nestlé is the exception, not the rule. Me being a skeptic, I’m sure that powerful lobbyists, public relations representatives and executives working behind closed doors are the ones who really made change. New media has certainly been a boon for activists all over the world, raising awareness and funds on an awe-inspiring level, but don’t be fooled that digital petitions and Facebook are enough to change the world. That is done with hard work and time donated by people who are committed, inspired and focused.
–Emily Long
Speaking of ways to make a difference, volunteer with The LAMP this summer!
New volunteer opportunities with The LAMP!
Tuesday, May 18th, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grasping at Gay
Wednesday, May 12th, 2010
In a way, the two points are related. With relatively little background on Kagan, the media doesn’t have much to talk about. She has been immersed in the academia side of law since 1999, and has been very private about her life and ideological views through the better part of her career. Even the New York Times, when highlighting her notable writings and statements, pulled almost exclusively from her 2009 confirmation hearing as Solicitor General. We don’t have anything like the “wise Latina woman” statement from Sonia Sotomayor, or Samuel Alito’s membership to a Princeton alumni club accused of trying to limit entry of women and minorities to the university.
Instead, we have her opposition to military recruitment on the Harvard campus because of the military’s ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ policy, and a picture of her playing baseball in 1993. The Wall Street Journal ran that photo on its front page for Monday, May 11, the same day Obama officially nominated her to the Court. Some gay activists were incensed over the picture, other gay activists thought people taking offense to the photo were being hypersensitive, and the White House refused to comment on Kagan’s sexual preferences. Towleroad.com, “a site with homosexual tendencies,” has a section devoted to Kagan news which runs the gamut of friends claiming she’s not gay, critics saying that if she is gay then she is unfit to judge, others asking if she would have to recuse herself from “gay cases” and a slew of other opinions which more or less enforce the idea that what a Supreme Court nominee does in her personal relationships is, in fact, our business.
That Kagan’s sexuality has become one of the dominating lines of her media narrative is not especially surprising. However, it is still disappointing that, lacking some other controversy, mainstream media is happy to fill its news cycle with stereotyping rather than taking the extra effort to dig deeper into facts and perform a meaningful analysis of them.
–Emily Long
This post was originally published on the IFC Make Media Matter blog here.
Gaslight: Media History in May
Monday, May 3rd, 2010
May 4, 1977: The first installment of David Frost’s interviews with former president Richard Nixon is broadcast. Since his resignation in the wake of the Watergate scandal, Nixon had never before apologized to the American people, nor had he admitted any wrongdoing. Because he resigned, and then was pardoned by President Gerald Ford, there was no formal impeachment trial, and many Americans lacked a sense of closure which was necessary to leave Watergate in the past and move forward. In 28 hours of interviews which were edited down to four 90-minute segments, Frost carefully maneuvered against Nixon’s canned responses and reluctance to discuss the details of Watergate. Ultimately, Frost’s strategy paid off and Americans were delivered a televised apology: “I let down my friends. I let down the country. I let down the system of government, and the dreams of all those young people that ought to get into government, but now think it too corrupt.”
May 8, 1886: The first Coca-Cola was served in Atlanta, GA in Jacob’s Pharmacy. The drink was created by Dr. John Stith Pemberton, made from carbonated water and a syrup he invented. The famous logo was designed by his bookkeeper, Frank Robinson, who also suggested the name. The logo has remained in use by the company ever since, and is one of the most recognized logos worldwide. Coca-Cola advertising campaigns have played a major role in popular culture and history; the company credits its 1931 Christmas advertising campaign as spearheading the modern-day image of Santa Claus as a round, jolly bearded man in a red suit, and the brand figures prominently in movie classics such as The Gods Must Be Crazy, Dr. Strangelove, One, Two, Three and hundreds of others. Advertising campaigns and product placements such as these have given rise to thousands of individual collectors of Coca-Cola memorabilia internationally, further cementing the the company’’s place in history as managing one of the most enduring brands ever.
May 14, 1915: Crisis struck the British home front during World War I when the London Times reported that casualties suffered in Britain’s first offensive in World War I were the direct result of inadequate ammunition in the field. What followed became known as the Shells Crisis, and a nightmare for the ruling Liberal party and Prime Minister Herbert Henry Asquith. After an extremely poor performance at The Battle of Neuve Chapelle, Field Marshal Sir John French told Times war correspondent Colonel Charles Repington that a lack of munitions was the reason for having lost over 11,000 men and gaining only 2 kilometers of ground in the battle against Germany. (However, it has also been suggested that French blamed the munitions shortage to cover up his own failings in leadership.) This touched off a whirlwind of fury which resulted in the creation of the Ministry of Munitions with Lloyd George at the helm, and Asquith was forced to accept a coalition government with George. Whether the Shells Crisis story was carefully maneuvered hype or genuine reporting, the story galvanized the public, brought down the government, and Britain went full force into World War One.




In this volunteer newsletter, we have great positions for everyone, including one paid position for LAMPcamp facilitators! We have lots going on over the summer with LAMPcamp (see right) and can’t do it without help from enthusiastic volunteers who are passionate about media literacy. We hope to see you soon!















